Our social:

Latest Post

Showing posts with label REPORT. Show all posts
Showing posts with label REPORT. Show all posts

Sunday, August 23, 2015

Medicinal Chemistry – driving therapeutic discovery


Medicinal Chemistry – driving therapeutic discovery
17/08/15

Professor Craig Lindsley, co-Director and Director of Medicinal Chemistry of the Vanderbilt Center for Neuroscience Drug Discovery, Vanderbilt University outlines how medicinal chemistry plays a role in drug discovery…
Medicinal chemistry is the application of synthetic organic chemistry to biological problems with the end goal of developing a novel small molecule therapeutic agent to treat an unmet medical need. Medicinal chemists are charged with understanding all aspects of drug discovery (chemistry, pharmacology, drug metabolism and in vivo behaviour), and utilising these diverse inputs to design molecules suitable for use in humans while also enabling intellectual property position, e.g., patent protection. Moreover, the chemistry (e.g., chemical matter) varies across programs, and the medicinal chemist must be an astute synthetic chemist with a broad repertoire of chemical knowledge to be successful. It is often unappreciated, but like medical doctors, most medicinal chemists spend more than 10 years in undergraduate, graduate and post-graduate education before landing their first pharmaceutical position.


While drug discovery is the very definition of ‘big team science’, medicinal chemists are perhaps the most well-rounded of all the scientists, following programs from conception to the clinic. Without question, medicinal chemistry is the major force driving therapeutic discovery and improving human health over the last 100 years – from antibiotics to chemotherapy to schizophrenia. Consider the past 25 years of medical advancement for which medicinal chemistry has led the charge. Medicinal chemists have developed revolutionary treatments for HIV/AIDs, rendering it a manageable disease from what was formerly a death sentence, fundamentally changed cardiovascular health (and CV-related deaths) with the statins (e.g., Lipitor), produced game-changing cancer therapies that can add more than 10 life-adjusted quality years, and in 2014, with the launch of Sovaldi, an HCV cure that eliminated the need for liver transplants.

Great strides have also been made in terms of brain disorders and therapeutics for the central nervous system (CNS). Here, medicinal chemists play dual roles, developing not only the small molecule drugs, but also diagnostic and imaging agents to enable personalised, effective treatments across diverse patient populations. New small molecule therapies are under clinical development for schizophrenia, Parkinson’s disease (PD), major depressive disorder (MDD) and Alzheimer’s disease (AD) that represent novel mechanisms of action with disease modifying potential and offer efficacy far beyond the standard of care. For schizophrenia, medicinal chemists rescued patients from asylums and electroshock therapy, with drugs that address the positive, negative and cognitive symptoms and enable them to integrate back into society. To this point, the top selling small molecule drug last year was Abilify, an antipsychotic with world-wide sales in excess of $9.2bn. In the case of PD, scientists have studied the brain circuit modified by invasive surgical procedure known as deep brain stimulation (DBS), identified molecular targets (proteins) that can be modulated to mimic DBS output, and then, medicinal chemists created small molecules to engage these targets and normalise these dysfunctional circuits. Three new drugs have launched in recent years for Multiple Sclerosis (MS), which have transformed how this neurodegenerative disease is managed, and medicinal chemists are now focused on neuroprotection/neuro-restoration strategies that will impact a broader array of CNS disorders. Here, in CNS drug discovery, medicinal chemists truly shine. Not only do they have to design and synthesise compounds to engage the desired target, but they must be orally bioavailable (e.g., a pill), cross the blood-brain barrier (evolutionarily designed to keep foreign chemicals out), and be safe to allow daily maintenance therapy for life. These are incredibly difficult requirements and challenging obstacles, but medicinal chemists surmount these issues, as they know patients are waiting, and driven to impact human health.


Despite these successes, medicinal chemists are under great employment pressure from the fiscal realities of outsourcing in developing nations, from downsizing/lay-offs due to mergers/acquisitions in the pharmaceutical/biotech industry, as well as pharmacoeconomics. Thus, the ranks have greatly dissipated, by approximately 70%, in the United States and Europe during the past 2 decades. These trends should alarm the public. When the next “HIV-like” epidemic emerges, we will have neither the needed number nor the diversity of medicinal chemists in place to effectively rally and combat such a scenario as we did in the 1990s, with disastrous results for society. Moreover, we should all consider Alzheimer’s disease (AD), forecasted to affect 1 in 5 over 65 by 2030, for which we have no cure, only palliative treatments. Scientists and medicinal chemists need to focus on AD as the drug discovery challenge of this generation to find disease-modifying treatments.


Rest assured, it is not all gloom and doom – medicinal chemists are actively and passionately working on the design and synthesis of new small molecules to address the unmet medical needs of the day, gradually replacing invasive surgical procedures and extended hospitalisations with simple pills or capsules one can take at home, with great overall savings and benefits for society. The next time you have an ailment that a physician can prescribe a drug to treat, as opposed to surgery, you have a dedicated medicinal chemist to thank.

Raising awareness of skin cancer

Raising awareness of skin cancer

22/08/15

Dr. Myrto-Georgia Trakatelli, Dermatologist and Chair of the Media & PR Committee at the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology (EADV) highlights the growing problem of skin cancer…

The skin is the largest organ of the body; it’s our contact with the rest of the world. We can see it, we can touch it and we can feel with it. Any change to it can be accessed directly by a simple visual examination. Unfortunately most of the times we look but we do not see, or we see too late.


Skin cancer is the most commonly occurring cancer in Europe. On average, about 1 in 6 Europeans will get diagnosed with a skin cancer during their lifetime. The 3 most common types of skin cancer are the very common basal cell carcinoma (about 85% of skin cancer cases or 70-165 new patients per 100,000 persons), and the less common types: squamous cell carcinoma (about 5% of all skin cancer cases or 4-50 new patients per 100,000 persons) and cutaneous malignant melanoma (about 5% of all skin cancer cases or 10-24 new patients per 100,000 persons). The latter is by far the most aggressive type especially when it is detected belatedly and it accounts for the majority of skin-cancer related deaths.


The frequency of these cancers is increasing rapidly all over Europe – by several percentage points each year. This is due not only to population growth and ageing, but also to a real increase in risk factors. Since many cancer registries do not routinely collect and/or report information on the annual number of new patients with basal cell carcinomas and squamous cell carcinomas, little is known about the exact magnitude of the problem in Europe. Moreover, many patients with basal cell carcinomas tend to develop several of these tumours in their lifetime, but, generally, at most one of these tumours is reported by the cancer registry. This results in an under-counting of numbers of basal cell carcinoma patients by about 30% of the reported numbers, implying that we are only seeing the tip of the iceberg.


The real magnitude of the skin cancer problem is even larger than estimated at present and this has large implications for the costs and organisation of our healthcare systems.


This makes the need for raising public awareness extremely important. Skin cancer can be prevented through primary prevention – i.e. explaining to the public how to avoid these cancers – and also through secondary prevention favouring early diagnosis.


The most obvious reason for cutaneous cancer occurrence is over-exposure to ultraviolet radiation either from the sun or from tanning beds. In 2009, the International Agency for Research on Cancer classified the whole ultraviolet spectrum and indoor tanning devices as carcinogenic to humans (group 1) together with substances such as asbestos, arsenic, tobacco and plutonium. The rationale for classifying UV and sunbeds as group 1 carcinogens was based on convincing evidence both from basic and epidemiological research.




We live in a time where having tanned skin has become a lifestyle choice and this has contributed to the increase of skin cancer cases. Messages explaining the importance of avoiding excessive UV exposure should start in childhood during schooling and continue in adulthood by stressing the importance of the damage that can be inflicted to the skin from wanting to tan at any price.


Some good news is that skin cancers and precursors to skin cancer are relatively easy to treat if detected early enough. Here we come back to the concept of looking and actually seeing. People should be taught what they should look for so that they can see it and have it removed as soon as possible. Public campaigns such as Euromelanoma have been running for more than a decade in numerous European countries trying to raise awareness on the one hand and provide information on primary and secondary prevention on the other.


Skin cancer awareness campaigns have also been organised in the European Parliament for the last 4 years by the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology (EADV) together with key opinion leaders such as the European Cancer Leagues (ECL), Euromelanoma and World Health Organization (WHO) aiming to inform on the various forms of skin cancer giving emphasis each time to a different politically important aspect of these malignancies. Members of European Parliament from various countries and parties have endorsed these campaigns, recognising the importance of these aspects and even addressing relevant questions about them to the EU commission.


The danger of UV exposure in outdoor workers was the main theme of the policy debate on the Skin Cancer Awareness Day 2015 that was hosted by Dr. Charles Tannock MEP, Vice President of the MEPs Against Cancer group of the European Parliament, an informal, all-party group of MEPs committed to policy action on cancer. The debate took place at the WHO Office at the European Union, in co-operation with EADV and ECL.


There is growing scientific evidence linking sun exposure in outdoor workers to the increasing incidence of skin cancer in this group. Outdoor workers appear to be at a 43% higher risk of basal cell carcinoma, and at a 77% higher risk of squamous cell carcinoma. This poses new challenges not only for the individuals concerned but also to employers, national health systems and social insurances. It has been calculated that in Europe more than 20 million workers are

UV exposed. Against this background, examples of recently enacted laws to protect outdoor workers at Member State level were discussed and the need for more targeted policy action at European level on decreasing the burden of occupational skin cancer was stressed.


Though there are definitely things that are progressing in the area of skin cancer in Europe, we should take the next step and go more than “skin deep” and to the “heart of the problem” by raising awareness, supporting research and registration, and implementing relevant legislation to protect the citizens. As dermatologists we are committed in this course and we are there to support our patients

MEDIA CENTRE - IARC IN THE NEWS


MEDIA CENTRE - IARC IN THE NEWS...report

IARC in the News" is a daily live feed that features global news coverage about IARC published in all languages.


The excerpts below are links to external media outlets. IARC cannot be held responsible for the accuracy or content of independent media reports displayed for reference purposes only.
 IARC does not necessarily endorse or approve of the views expressed therein.

Cancer research 50 years and counting new report

Cancer  research – 50 years and counting

17/07/15

Christopher P. Wild, Director at the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) outlines how 50 years on, prevention still remains key to cancer research…

 

“Have you found a cure yet?”

Which cancer researcher upon revealing their profession has not faced this question? One can respond confidently with examples of major improvements in survival: childhood leukaemia, testicular and breast cancers being notable. One can point to remarkable insights into the previously hidden biology of cancer, with drugs now tailored to exploit the molecular Achilles heel of an individual tumour. These triumphs of scientific creativity and endeavour merit the telling. Yet the disturbing, deeper truth is we cannot treat our way out of the cancer problem.


As people live longer and populations increase, the number of new cancers each year is projected to rise sharply. In 2035, just 20 years from now, there will be an estimated 10 million more people every year facing a cancer diagnosis. Increases are greatest in the developing countries where there is least capacity to treat and care for patients. The spread of risk factors linked to western patterns of individual behaviour and societal structure will exacerbate the problem. Even for the world’s richest countries the spiralling cost of cancer means improved treatment alone is an inadequate response. For the world’s poorest, the out-of-pocket expenses of treatment for one individual can be financially catastrophic for an extended family. The pain of cancer is far reaching. How did we end up here and what might be done better?


Fifty years ago, when the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) was established, IARC scientists considered the striking global variations in cancer patterns and decided to study the causes of this heterogeneity as an avenue to prevention. Over the last 5 decades IARC played its part, with many others, in discovering human carcinogens. Tobacco remains the pre-eminent culprit. Chronic infections account for 16% of all cancers, one in 4 in the most populous nation, China. Alcohol, radiation including excess sunlight, unhealthy diets, environmental contaminants and occupational exposures all contribute. Imbalances in calorie intake and expenditure are adding to the problem; many people are no longer moving enough to justify the amount they eat and drink.



Estimates vary but one can safely conjecture that some 40-50% of cancers could be prevented by translating this accumulated knowledge into interventions. Further inroads are made by detection of early-stage cancers or pre-cancerous conditions, combined with more effective treatment e.g. for cervical, breast, colorectal and oral cancers. Furthermore, prevention and early detection demonstrably work. Major declines in lung cancer following reduced tobacco consumption are remarkable as are the falls in cervical cancer following introduction of screening. Improved protection against work place carcinogens form part of the successes. Vaccination against hepatitis B virus and human papilloma viruses will in time yield their fruits. Many interventions have added value through reducing other illnesses of aging such as cardiovascular disease and diabetes.


Despite proof and promise, prevention is too often neglected. Commonly less than 5% of cancer research funding goes to prevention, a proportion dwarfed by the investment in basic science and clinical translational research. In addition, the science that is performed too often remains at the stage of proof-of-principle, with a failure to implement. This under-investment in research and in implementation is costly and while the underlying drivers are complex, they merit exploration.


Part of the problem may be time. The benefits of prevention can take many years to manifest. This is incompatible with the duration of a political mandate (at least in most democracies) but also with the immediacy of people’s personal experience, where what is sought is a cure. Economics is important, because while new therapeutics offer opportunities for private sector investment and growth, public health interventions are perceived as cost pressures. Complexity is a further element. Prevention requires a multi-sectoral cooperation across health, transport, environment, etc., to address the “causes of the causes”. Responsibility has been too often placed solely on the shoulders of the individual whereas tobacco control has shown how appropriate legislation has been key to success.




Nevertheless, this is an exciting time for cancer prevention. Advances in cancer biology offer fresh impetus to studies of causes, early detection and prevention. Implementation research, close to policy, can better indicate factors which help or hinder the translation of promising interventions into effective national programmes. Thorough analyses of the economic benefits of prevention may yet reduce the unpopularity of the Minister of Health among government colleagues. Prevention, applied at the population level, offers a sustainable approach contributing in turn to reduced inequalities in society.


From a global perspective the necessity of prevention is blindingly obvious. IARC enters its second 50 years with a renewed mandate to conduct cancer research for cancer prevention. As there is an undeniable responsibility to offer the very best in treatments for the patients of today, there is also an undeniable responsibility to prevent the suffering from cancer for the populations of tomorrow. Perhaps eventually, on revealing one’s identity as a cancer researcher to a new generation, the question may just occasionally be: “Can you prevent it yet?

WORLD CANCER REPORT 2015


WORLD CANCER REPORT


World Cancer Report 2015

ABOUT THIS BOOK


This book from the International Agency for Research on Cancer,

 the specialized cancer agency of the World Health Organization,

 provides a unique global view of cancer, including cancer 

patterns, causes, and prevention. The World Cancer Report series 

is recognized as an authoritative source of global perspective 

and information on cancer. The first volume appeared in 2003 and 

the second in 2008. This third volume in the series encompasses 

both established knowledge and recent research achievement.



World Cancer Report provides a professional, multidisciplinary 

assessment of all aspects of the geographical distribution, 

biology, etiology, prevention, and control of cancer, predicated 

on research. The concise nature of the text and the high graphic 

content (hundreds of colour maps, diagrams, and photographs) 

make 

the publication accessible to a broad readership. World Cancer 

Report is designed to provide non-specialist health 

professionals 

and policy-makers with a balanced understanding of cancer 

control 

and to provide established cancer professionals with insights 

about recent development.

The book includes chapters in which distinguished scientists 

from 

around the world provide a broad overview of established 

knowledge and then emphasize research activity and progress. In 

addition, text boxes distributed throughout the book provide 

short, in-depth discussions of selected questions or topics. A 

new feature of this volume is the inclusion of Perspectives 

considering the future development of different aspects of 

cancer 

research, written by those whose record of outstanding 

achievement qualifies them as individuals having unique vision.